<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Self-Reflection on Luke's Blog</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/tags/self-reflection/</link><description>Recent content in Self-Reflection on Luke's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 23:01:57 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.lukeliang.uk/tags/self-reflection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Interrogated by a Machine</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20260714-2301/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 23:01:57 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20260714-2301/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I do due diligence for a living. I sit across from founders and ask the questions they hope I won&amp;rsquo;t ask: what happens if you&amp;rsquo;re wrong, where is the key-person risk, show me the assumption your whole model quietly rests on. It is a comfortable seat. The person asking the questions is never the one being measured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week I lost the seat. To a machine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It started as a game. Twenty questions — I think of something, the AI guesses. It took seventeen turns to figure out I was thinking of &amp;ldquo;a human being,&amp;rdquo; and afterward it diagnosed its own failure with a phrase that stuck with me: it had searched the entire animal kingdom while excluding the questioner&amp;rsquo;s own species from the candidate set. A blind spot, it said, of leaving yourself out of the search space.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>