<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Private-Markets on Luke's Blog</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/tags/private-markets/</link><description>Recent content in Private-Markets on Luke's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:58:26 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.lukeliang.uk/tags/private-markets/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Expensive In, Narrow Out: Why China VC Barely Pays Today</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20261003-1558/</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:58:26 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20261003-1558/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;2026 looks like a good year for Chinese venture capital. IPOs are returning, and the most visible AI and chip companies have produced eye-catching paper gains. I have invested in China&amp;rsquo;s private markets for more than a decade, but the question I keep coming back to is different: how much of that paper value will reach the people who financed the funds?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first half of 2026, seven companies accounted for 41% of the value of VC/PE holdings in newly listed Chinese companies, measured at their issue prices.&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; That concentration matters. &lt;strong&gt;My view is that, at today&amp;rsquo;s entry prices, many smaller independent managers and individual LPs are unlikely to earn net returns that justify the risk and a decade of illiquidity.&lt;/strong&gt; This is a judgment about a particular part of the market, not a claim that no Chinese VC fund can perform well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>