<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Philosophy on Luke的网络日志</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/tags/philosophy/</link><description>Recent content in Philosophy on Luke的网络日志</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 21:25:20 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.lukeliang.uk/tags/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>I Do Not Know, and I Must Act</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20260712-2125/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 21:25:20 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20260712-2125/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="an-operational-epistemology"&gt;An operational epistemology&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not going to argue for anything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the question of whether human beings can know the world, I have argued many times, and I have learned something uncomfortable: &lt;strong&gt;I am weak on that battlefield.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lines I was proudest of — &lt;em&gt;the ultimate truth is faith&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;human beings cannot know&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;the world is not built on logic&lt;/em&gt; — &lt;strong&gt;each has a true first half and a conclusion that does not follow.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Answer of the Fugue: On Rules, Recursion, and a Metronome Hardcoded in Silicon</title><link>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20260712-2021/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 20:21:29 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.lukeliang.uk/posts/20260712-2021/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="prelude-two-voices"&gt;Prelude: Two Voices&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On January 3, 2009, someone whose identity no one knows wrote a rule into a piece of code:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For every 210,000 blocks produced, the issuance of new coins is halved.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rule gives no reason. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t explain why 210,000, doesn&amp;rsquo;t explain why halving rather than some other decay. It simply &lt;strong&gt;exists&lt;/strong&gt;, like an axiom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seventeen years later, on some night in 2026, I sat in front of my screen and wrote down a rule of my own:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>